Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
G
GUM-compliant neural network robustness verification - a Masters thesis
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
ludwig10_masters_thesis
GUM-compliant neural network robustness verification - a Masters thesis
Commits
459d6cd4
Verified
Commit
459d6cd4
authored
2 years ago
by
Björn Ludwig
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
wip(thesis): work on preliminaries
parent
48380b9d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
src/thesis/Thesis_408230.tex
+9
-0
9 additions, 0 deletions
src/thesis/Thesis_408230.tex
src/thesis/preliminaries.tex
+6
-2
6 additions, 2 deletions
src/thesis/preliminaries.tex
with
15 additions
and
2 deletions
src/thesis/Thesis_408230.tex
+
9
−
0
View file @
459d6cd4
...
...
@@ -226,6 +226,15 @@
in future applications of neural networks in their field
\item
that's why we consider only continuously differentiable activation functions
such as parametric softplus and
\textit
{
QuadLU
}
\item
for the sake of simplicity we do not consider the procedure to determine
the inputs' uncertainties but assume that all measures were taken to express it in
alignment with the GUM and its understanding
\item
moreover we usually will conceive the uncertainty either given as an
expanded uncertainty with an appropriately large coverage factor or as stated
in~
\cite
[4.3.7]
{
jcgm
_
guide
_
2020
}
\item
for the latter cases, when the uncertainty is given in form of an
interval
$
[
x
_
i
-
a, x
_
i
+
a
]
$
the associated variance
$
u
^
2
(
x
_
i
)
$
would be given
as
$
u
^
2
(
x
_
i
)
=
a
^
2
/
3
$
\end{itemize}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
src/thesis/preliminaries.tex
+
6
−
2
View file @
459d6cd4
...
...
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ regarding those definitions.
\section
{
Terms related to measurement uncertainty
}
\label
{
sec:terms-related-to
-measurement-uncertainty
}
\begin{definition}
[uncertainty]
\label
{
def:uncertainty
}
\begin{definition}
[uncertainty]
\label
{
def:uncertainty
}
(or
\enquote*
{
measurement uncertainty
}
or
\enquote*
{
uncertainty of measurement
}
)
(non-negative) parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that
characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to
...
...
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ regarding those definitions.
square root of a sum of terms, the terms being the variances or covariances of
these other quantities weighted according to how the measurement result varies
with changes in these quantities
\begin{equation}
\uc
^
2(y) =
\sum
_{
i=1
}^{
N
}
\left
(
\frac
{
\partial
f
}{
\partial
x
_
i
}
\right
)
^
2 u
^
2(x
_
i)
\label
{
eq:combined-standard-uncertainty
}
\end{equation}
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
[Coverage factor]
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment