
%---------------------------
\listfiles
\documentclass[en,KK,2015]{kalibrierschein}
\resultTable{ 6 }{%
{\(p_{cal}\)}&{\(p_{ind}\)}&{\(p_r\)}&{\(p_{ind} - p_r\)}&{\(e\)}&{\(U(k=2)\)}\\
mbar&mbar&mbar&mbar&&\\\toprule\endhead
2.954E-08&3.27E-08&1.66E-09&3.10E-08&5.1E-02&2.6E-02\\
4.970E-08&5.35E-08&1.65E-09&5.19E-08&4.3E-02&2.4E-02\\
8.908E-08&9.53E-08&1.63E-09&9.37E-08&5.2E-02&2.4E-02\\
2.991E-07&3.17E-07&1.68E-09&3.15E-07&5.4E-02&2.4E-02\\
4.805E-07&5.29E-07&1.80E-09&5.27E-07&9.7E-02&2.4E-02\\
4.810E-07&5.29E-07&2.00E-09&5.27E-07&9.6E-02&2.4E-02\\
5.024E-07&5.30E-07&1.80E-09&5.28E-07&5.1E-02&2.4E-02\\
8.916E-07&9.37E-07&1.52E-09&9.35E-07&4.9E-02&2.2E-02\\
2.943E-06&3.07E-06&1.77E-09&3.07E-06&4.3E-02&2.2E-02\\
4.922E-06&5.13E-06&2.02E-09&5.13E-06&4.2E-02&2.2E-02\\
8.827E-06&9.25E-06&3.20E-09&9.24E-06&4.7E-02&2.2E-02\\
2.957E-05&3.05E-05&4.10E-09&3.05E-05&3.1E-02&2.2E-02\\
4.892E-05&5.01E-05&6.70E-09&5.01E-05&2.4E-02&2.2E-02\\
8.768E-05&8.87E-05&7.70E-09&8.87E-05&1.1E-02&2.2E-02\\
8.960E-05&8.88E-05&1.20E-08&8.88E-05&-9.1E-03&2.2E-02\\
8.768E-05&8.88E-05&1.00E-08&8.88E-05&1.3E-02&2.2E-02\\
}
\missingEntries{ 16 }
\object{ Stabil Ion Gauge }
\manufacturer{ Granville-Phillips }
\type{ EXT-Y, Stabil Ion Controler 370B }
\serialNo{ YEA06800, # & _ ^ 1449 } 
\applicant{ 
  { Customer.Name } 
  { Customer.Address.Street } 
  { Customer.Address.Zipcode Customer.Address.Town }
  { Customer.Address.District } 
}

\refNo{ ? }
\calibMark{ 75120 PTB 13 }
\calibDate{ 2013-11-26 }
\byOrder{ Dr. K. Jousten }
\examiner{ ? }
\certificateDate{ 2013-12-18 }
\begin{document}

\printFirstPage
   \section{ Description of the calibration device }

   \IfLanguageName{ngerman}{DEUTSCH}{ENGLISH}

   %\num{9.99E-7 +- 9E-9} \par \bigskip
   \num{9.99 +- 0.09} \par \bigskip

       The device was shipped under atmospheric pressure kept in the producers plastic shell.
       A memory module belonging to the stabil ion gauge (serial 06800) was provided. It was active during calibration.
     \section{ Calibration procedure }
       The device was installed in a vertical orientation. Before calibration the gauge head was baked at \(?\) °C for \(?\) h. During the cool down phase the head was degassed for \(?\) minutes. At room temperature it was exposed for \(?\) h at \(?⋅10^{?}\) mbar argon for sputtering the ion collector.
       The sensitivity factor was kept at an value of  \(?\) mbar\(^{-1}\) during the calibration. The calibration was carried out with the following device settings:
       \begin{itemize}\item display: mbar\item filament: F1\item emission: L\item channel: A\end{itemize}
       Before each calibration point the residual pressure indication \(p_r\)  was checked.
       The temperature \(θ\)  during the calibration was \(?\) °C and varied from this value within \(\pm?\) °C.
       The device was calibrated with ? in the pressure range \(?⋅ 10^{?}\) mbar to \(?⋅10^{?}\) mbar by comparing its reading with the calibration pressure that was established by the primary standard CE3 of PTB applying the continuous expansion method.
     \section{ Relative error of indication }
       The correction factor \(CF\) given in the table below was calculated from the indicated pressure \(p_{ind}\) as follows:\[CF =\frac{p_{cal}}{p_{ind} - p_{r}}\] where \(p_{cal}\) denotes the calibration pressure as generated in the primary standard and \(p_{r}\) the reading at residual pressure. From this, the corrected pressure \(p\) can be calculated from the residual pressure indication and the indicated pressure by:\[p = CF (p_{ind} - p_{r})\]
       The uncertainty \(U\) of \(CF\) at the time of calibration is given in the last column of the table below. It includes the repeatability of \(p_{ind}\) for otherwise identical conditions (\(p_{cal}\), \(θ\)).\printResultTable
     \section{ Uncertainty of Calibration }
       The uncertainty \(U\) stated is the expanded measurement uncertainty obtained by multiplying the standard measurement uncertainty by the coverage factor \(k = 2\). It has been determined in accordance with the  “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)”. The value of the measurand then normally lies, with a probability of approximately \(95\) \%. within the attributed coverage interval.\par \(95\)\,\%  95\,\% 95~\% \(95\) \%  \par
       95 \% 95 \%
   \printLastPage
\end{document}
%---------------------------


\(95\)\,\%  95\,\% 95~\%

